目的探讨单侧双通道内镜(UBE)技术治疗腰椎间盘突出伴或不伴椎管狭窄症的疗效。方法选择23例腰椎间盘突出伴或不伴椎管狭窄症患者作为研究对象。所有患者均采用UBE治疗。观察患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间和手术相关并发症等,比较术前、术后1周及术后7个月的VAS评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评估治疗评分(以下简称JOA评分),分析术后7个月的临床疗效。结果(1)23例患者均顺利完成手术,术中无更改手术方式的患者。手术时间65~95(76.74±8.61)min;术中出血量35~70(52.74±9.51)mL;住院时间5~9(6.96±1.36)d;术中出现硬脊膜撕裂1例,经保守治疗后切口一期愈合;术后下肢麻木症状较术前加重1例,无肌力下降及活动障碍,予以甲钴胺、地塞米松、甘露醇等药物治疗5 d后症状缓解。所有患者在住院期间和出院后随访期间均未出现硬膜外血肿、切口感染及手术节段椎间盘突出复发。(2)术后1周、术后7个月的腰背部VAS评分、腿部VAS评分、腰背部ODI均较术前降低,腰背部JOA评分均较术前升高(均P<0.05);术后7个月的腰背部ODI较术后1周降低,腰背部JOA评分较术后1周升高(均P<0.05);而术后7个月的腰背部VAS评分及腿部VAS评分与术后1周比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(3)术后7个月的临床疗效优良率为91.30%。结论采用UBE治疗腰椎间盘突出伴或不伴椎管狭窄症的临床疗效满意,具有创伤小、手术视野清晰、减压彻底、并发症少、脊柱稳定性好等特点,值得临床推广应用。
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with or without spinal stenosis. MethodsA total of 23 patients with lumbar disc herniation with or without spinal stenosis were selected as the research objects. All patients were treated with UBE. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospital stay and operation-related complications were observed. The VAS score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) therapeutic evaluation score (hereinafter referred to as JOA score) before operation, 1 week and 7 months after operation were compared, and the clinical efficacy 7 months after operation was analyzed. Results(1) The surgery went successful in all 23 patients, with no one changing the surgical method. The operation time was 65-95 (76.74±8.61) min. The intraoperative bleeding volume was 35-70 (52.74±9.51) mL. The hospital stay was 5-9 (6.96±1.36) d. One case had spinal dura mater laceration during operation, and the incision healed by first intention after conservative treatment. Postoperative lower limb numbness symptoms were worse than those before operation in 1 case, without muscle strength decrease and activity obstacle, which was relieved by treatment with mecobalamin, dexamethasone, mannitol and other drugs for 5 days. No patients had spinal dura mater edema, incision infection, and recurrent intervertebral disc herniation in the vertebra involved in the operation during the hospitalization and the follow-up after discharge. (2) One week and 7 months after operation, the VAS scores of the low back, VAS scores of the leg, and the ODI of low back were all decreased compared with the preoperative values, while the JOA scores of low back were increased compared with the preoperative values (all P<0.05). Seven months after operation, the ODI of low back was lower than that 1 week after operation, while the JOA score of low back was higher than that 1 week after operation (all P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score of low back and leg between 7 months after operation and 1 week after operation (all P>0.05). (3) The excellent and good rate of clinical efficacy was 91.30% 7 months after operation. ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of UBE in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with or without spinal stenosis is satisfactory, with the characteristics of less trauma, clear surgical vision, complete decompression, fewer complications and good spinal stability, which is worthy of clinical application.