目的探讨三维计算机断层扫描支气管血管成像(3D-CTBA)联合3D打印技术应用于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术前规划及术中导航辅助的临床价值。方法纳入早期NSCLC行胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术治疗的81例患者,随机分为3D-CTBA联合3D打印组(简称3D打印组,30例)、3D-CTBA组(29例)、CT薄扫组(22例)。记录和比较3组患者的手术基本情况、手术复杂程度、围术期相关指标及术后并发症发生情况。结果(1)3组均顺利完成手术,无中转开放手术或改变术式的患者。术前定位:CT薄扫组术前Hookwire定位11例;3D-CTBA组、3D打印组均行三维重建无创定位,定位成功率100.0%(59/59)。3D-CTBA组术前规划与术中实际符合率为96.6%(28/29),3D打印组符合率100.0%(30/30)。(2)3组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切缘距离、术后住院时间比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),且组间两两比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.017)。将以上4项指标按手术难度进行分层比较,各难度级别3组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);两两比较结果显示,在手术时间、术中出血量、切缘距离、术后住院时间方面,3D打印组各难度级别的指标水平均优于CT薄扫组(均P<0.017);3D打印组复杂难度手术的手术时间、术中出血量、切缘距离及各难度级别的术后住院时间均优于3D-CTBA组(均P<0.017);3D-CTBA组一般、中等难度手术的手术时间及中等难度手术的术中出血量优于CT薄扫组(均P<0.017)。3组患者结节直径、术后引流量、切除淋巴结数目、术后置管时间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。(3)3组术后并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两两比较结果显示3D打印组术后并发症发生率低于CT薄扫组(均P<0.017)。结论个体化应用3D-CTBA规划导航联合3D打印建模辅助早期NSCLC胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术,能够使手术更安全、精准、便捷,促进患者快速康复,在中高难度肺段手术中更具优势,值得临床推广应用。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) combined with 3D printing technology applying for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation assistance on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in early stage. MethodsEighty-one NSCLC patients in early stage undergoing thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to 3D-CTBA combined with 3D printing group (3D printing group for short, 30 cases), 3D-CTBA group (29 cases), and thin-layer CT scan group (22 cases). Basic states of the surgery, complexity of the surgery, perioperative related indices, and the prevalence of postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the three groups. Results(1) The surgery for three groups was successfully completed, without transferring to open surgery or surgical methods changes. Preoperative localization: preoperative Hookwire localization was employed to 11 cases in the thin-layer CT scan group; moreover, three-dimensional non-invasive localization was used to the 3D-CTBA and the 3D printing groups, with the successful rate of 100.0% (59/59). The accordance rate between preoperative planning and intraoperative facts was 96.6% (28/29) in the 3D-CTBA group, whereas the aforesaid rate of the 3D printing group was 100.0% (30/30). (2) There were statistically significant differences in surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, distance from incision edge, postoperative hospital stays between the three groups (all P<0.05), and the difference of pairwise comparison was statistically significant (all P<0.017). The 4 aforesaid indicators were hierarchically compared according to the difficulties of the surgery, and the differences between various difficulties of the three groups were statistically significant (all P<0.05); moreover, pairwise comparison revealed that the 3D printing group yielded superior levels of indicators in various difficulties, including surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, distance from incision edge, and postoperative hospital stays, to compared with the thin-layer CT scan group (all P<0.017); furthermore, the 3D printing group obtained superior indicators levels in the complex surgery including surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, distance from incision edge, and superior levels in various difficulties of postoperative hospital stays to compared with the 3D-CTBA group (all P<0.017); in addition, compared to the thin-layer CT scan group, the 3D-CTBA group expressed superior levels of surgical duration in terms of general and moderate surgical difficulties, and superior level of intraoperative bleeding volume in moderate surgical difficulty (all P<0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in nodal diameter, postoperative drainage volume, number of lymph node removal, and postoperative tube indwelling time between the three groups (all P>0.05). (3) The difference of the incidence of postoperative complications was statistically significant (P<0.05), and the pairwise comparison demonstrated that the 3D printing group exhibited lower incidence of postoperative complications as compared with the thin-layer CT scan group (all P<0.017). ConclusionThe thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy will be safer, more accurate and convenient, and may promote rapid recovery of patients via individually employing 3D-CTBA in planning navigation combined with 3D printing modelling assistance for NSCLC in early stage. The aforementioned technology has more advantages in moderate and high difficulties of lung segmentectomy, and thus it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.