目的探讨腹腔镜辅助D2根治术对进展期胃癌患者的临床疗效及生存率的影响。方法选取进展期胃癌患者147例,采用随机数字表法分为腹腔镜组(n=75)和开腹组(n=72)。腹腔镜组行腹腔镜辅助D2根治术,开腹组采用常规开腹D2根治术。比较两组患者的手术基本情况(手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次肛门排气时间)、肿瘤根治指标(清扫淋巴结总数、远切端距肿瘤距离以及近切端距肿瘤距离)、并发症发生率、生存率及复发率。结果腹腔镜组患者手术时间长于开腹组,手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后首次肛门排气时间短/少于开腹组,并发症发生率低于开腹组(均P<0.05)。两组清扫淋巴结总数、远切端距肿瘤距离以及近切端距肿瘤距离比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。腹腔镜组与开腹组患者1、3、5年生存率分别为89.21%、63.07%、55.42%和89.78%、61.47%、57.83%,两组生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。随访期间,两组复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(45.07% vs. 51.52%,P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌D2根治术是一种安全、可行的治疗方法。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical resection on the clinical efficacy and survival rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. MethodsA total of 147 patients with advanced gastric cancer were selected, and they were divided into laparoscopy group(n=75) and laparotomy group (n=72) by the random number table method. The laparoscopy group was treated with laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical resection, whereas the laparotomy group was treated with conventional open D2 radical resection. The basic information of surgery (surgical incision length, operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative first anal exhaust time), tumor radical indicators (total number of lymph nodes dissection, distance from distal and proximal resection end to the tumor), the incidence of complications, the survival rate and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe laparoscopy group had longer operative time, a shorter length of the incision and postoperative first anal exhaust time, less intraoperative bleeding volume, as well as a lower complications rate as compared with the laparotomy group (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of lymph nodes dissection, and the distance from the distal and proximal resection end to the tumor between the two groups (all P>0.05). The one-, three- and five-year survival rates of patients in the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group were 89.21%, 63.07%, 55.42%, and 89.78%, 61.47%, 57.83%, respectively, without statistically significant differences between the two groups (all P>0.05). During follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (45.07% vs. 51.52%, P>0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopic-assisted radical resection for advanced gastric cancer is a safe and feasible surgical treatment.