ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of interventional embolization with craniotomy and clipping for treating anterior communicating aneurysm. MethodsForty-eight patients with anterior communicating aneurysm were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 24 cases in each group. The observation group was given interventional embolization, while the control group was given craniotomy and clipping. Clinical efficacy, Hunt-Hess grade after treatment, Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS) score, and incidence rate of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe total effective rate in the observation group was 95.83%, which was significantly higher than 75.00% in the control group; in comparison with the control group, the observation group had superior Hunt-Hess grade and GOS score, and a lower incidence rate of complications (P＜0.05). ConclusionInterventional embolization in the treatment of anterior communicating aneurysm can improve clinical efficacy, promote patients′ functional recovery, reduce the incidence rate of postoperative complications, and make the treatment much safer. It is worthy of promotion.

无