目的探讨腹腔镜下内外括约肌间切除术(ISR)治疗低位直肠癌的临床效果。方法选择低位直肠癌患者160例为观察对象,其中采用腹腔镜行ISR手术的患者80例为观察组,接受开腹ISR术的80例为对照组。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间及术后并发症、复发率等情况,观察两组淋巴结清扫数目、病理结果及TNM临床分期等,统计5年转移及生存情况。结果两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间及住院时间均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组淋巴结清扫数量、组织分化程度、TNM分期、肛门功能Kirwan分级比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组5年局部复发率、5年远处转移率、5年总生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下行内外括约肌间切除术可以达到完全切除肿瘤的治疗效果,且手术创伤小,出血量少,胃肠功能恢复快,疗效确切。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) for treating lower rectal cancer. MethodsA total of 160 patients with low rectal cancer were enrolled as objects. Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic ISR were enrolled as observation group and the other 80 patients undergoing open ISR as control group. The related indices were compared between the two groups, including operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, duration for postoperative anal exhaust, postoperative complications and recrudescence rate. The number of removal lymph nodes, pathological result and TNM clinical stage were observed in both group. The 5-year metastasis and survival were statistically analyzed. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the operative duration between the two groups(P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, duration for postoperative anal exhaust, duration for diet normalization and hospital stay were shorter in the observation group compared to the control group(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of removal lymph nodes, tissue differentiation, TNM stage and Kirwan classification for anal function between the two groups(P>0.05). There was significant difference in the incident rate of complications between the two groups(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the 5-year metastasis rate and 5-year survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopic ISR can achieve a therapeutic effect of total tumor resection, less surgical trauma, less blood loss, fast gastrointestinal function recovery and definite efficacy.