当前位置:首页 / 经皮椎间孔镜与开放手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的Meta分析
论著 | 更新时间:2018-03-02
|
经皮椎间孔镜与开放手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的Meta分析
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery and open surgery for treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a Meta analysis

微创医学 201813卷01期 页码:34-38+44

作者机构:广西中医药大学附属瑞康医院脊柱微创中心,南宁市530011

基金信息:*通信作者

DOI:DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2018.01.10

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献
目的对经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)与开放手术(OS)治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床效果作系统评价。方法计算机检索建库至2017年7月Cochrane Library、PubMed、Medline、中国知网、维普和万方等数据库文献,同时辅以手工检索,收集关于PTED 和OS治疗LSS的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据纳入与排除标准进行文献筛选、质量评价和数据提取后,应用Revman 5.3软件对各项指标进行Meta分析。结果最终8篇文献共770例观察对象被纳入,其中PTED组389例,开放手术组381例。结果分析显示,PTED组与OS组在手术时间、出血量、住院时间、术后VAS评分和术后Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)等方面的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统的开放手术相比,PTED治疗腰椎管狭窄症具有出血量少、创伤小、术后康复快、疗效好等优点。
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED) and open surgery(OS)for treating lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS). MethodsThe databases of computer retrieval from establishment to July 2017 included Cochrane library, PubMed, Medline, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang Database. Manual retrieval was also conducted. Random control trials(RCTs) about PTED and OS for treating LSS were collected. The literatures were screened according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, then quality assessment and data extraction were performed. Meta analysis for each indicator by RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsEight RCTs consisting of 770 subjects were enrolled eventually. PTED group and OS group consisted of 389 patients and 381 patients respectively. The results showed that there were significant differences in the operative duration, blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative VAS scores and Oswestry disability index between the PTED group and OS group (P<0.05) . ConclusionCompared with the OS, PTED for LSS has the advantages of less blood loss and trauma, faster postoperative recovery and good efficacy.

2574

浏览量

895

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集