微创医学

目的比较腹腔镜下微创手术和常规手术治疗子宫肌瘤患者的效果。方法150例子宫肌瘤患者，根据病例号分为两组，单数为试验组，双数为对照组，每组75例。试验组采用腹腔镜下微创手术治疗，对照组采用常规术式治疗，比较两组患者手术客观指标、术后并发症以及生存质量。结果试验组患者手术时间与对照组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；对照组患者术中出血量明显多于试验组，住院时间明显长于试验组，术后体温明显低于对照组，两组比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。试验组并发症发生率为2.7%，低于对照组（9.3%），两组比较，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。试验组生活质量高者52例，生活质量一般者16例，评价有效率为90.7%；对照组患者生活质量高者37例，生活质量一般者25例，评价有效率为82.7%，两组比较，差异具有统计学意义（u=2.480，P=0.013）。结论腹腔镜下微创手术能够降低患者并发症发生率、改善患者生活质量，安全性更高。

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery and conventional surgery in the treatment of hysteromyoma. MethodsA total of 150 cases with hysteromyoma were divided into two groups according to the case numbers, the singulars were set as experimental group, and the doubles were set as control group, 75 cases in each group. The experimental group received minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, and the control group received conventional surgery treatment. The indicators of surgery, postoperative complications, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P＞0.05); The amount of bleeding in the control group was significantly more than that of the experimental group, the length of stay was significantly longer than that of the experimental group, the postoperative body temperature was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 2.7%, lower than that of the control group (9.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The quality of life of experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). ConclusionMinimally invasive laparoscopic surgery can reduce the incidence of complications and improve the quality of life of patients.