目的比较经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗老年性椎体压缩性骨折的临床效果。方法对90例老年椎体压缩性骨折患者,采用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组各45例,研究组采用经皮椎体成形术治疗,对照组采用椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价患者的疼痛程度,综合比较两组患者治疗总有效率、治疗前后VAS疼痛评分、椎体前缘高度、Cobb’s角及并发症情况。结果研究组治疗总有效率为95.6%(43/45),高于对照组的77.8%(35/45)(P<0.05);治疗后研究组VAS疼痛评分低于对照组(P<0.05),椎体前缘高度、Cobb’s角均明显优于对照组(P<0.05);研究组出现骨水泥椎间盘渗漏1例,对照组出现椎体疼痛2例,两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经皮椎体成形术治疗老年性椎体压缩性骨折效果确切,操作简单,可明显改善骨折疼痛症状,促进患者早日康复,优于椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,值得临床推广使用。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty and pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of elderly vertebral body compression fracture. MethodA total of 90 cases with elderly vertebral body compression fracture were randomly divided into research group and control group, 45 cases in each group. Patients of research group were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty,and patients of control group were treated by pedicle screw internal fixation. Pain levels were evaluated by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The effective rate,VAS scores before and after treatment, height of anterior vertebral body, Cobb′s angle and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe total effective rate of the research group was 95.6% (43/45), the control group was 77.8% (35/45), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS scores of research group were lower than that of control group (P<0.05); Height of anterior vertebral body and Cobb′s angle of research group were superior to those of control group (P<0.05).One patient had cement leakage connected with the disc space in research group, and two patients had vertebral pain in control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative complications (P>0.05). ConclusionPercutaneous vertebral angioplasty in the treatment of senile vertebral compression fracture effect is exact, simple operation, can significantly improve the pain symptoms of fracture; it is worthy of clinical application.