目的探讨超声引导下连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)在髌骨骨折切开复位内固定手术镇痛中的临床效果。方法将98例硬腰联合阻滞麻醉下完成单侧髌骨骨折手术的患者,按照数字表法随机分为两组,对照组49例行术后自控静脉镇痛(PCIA),观察组49例为超声引导下CFNB,比较两组临床疗效。结果观察组术后8 h、12 h、24 h、48 h静息状态VAS评分显著地低于对照组(P<0.05),而观察组功能锻炼时的VAS评分为(2.03±0.95)分,显著地低于对照组(4.59±0.94)分(P<0.05),观察组在术后4 h的股四头肌肌力显著弱于对照组(P<0.05),其他时间点两组间肌力比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),观察组术后24 h、36 h、48 h患肢主动关节屈曲角度显著地大于对照组(P<0.05),对照组不良反应发生率42.86%(21/49),高于观察组的6.12%(3/49)。观察组患者满意度评分为(7.74±1.35)分,显著地高于对照组(6.05±1.78)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下CFNB用于髌骨骨折术后镇痛效果良好,对肌力影响小,能有效缓解髌骨骨折术后疼痛,不良反应发生率低,患者满意度高。
ObjectiveTo explore the analgesic effect of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) guided by ultrasound in patients with patellar fracture. MethodsNinety-eight patients with unilateral patellar fracture were randomly divided into observation group and control group,49 cases in each group.The patients of control group received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after operation, and the patients of observation group were given CFNB-guided by ultrasound. ResultsThe resting VAS socres of 8h, 12h, 24h and 48h after operation in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). And the VAS score during function exercise of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The four femoral muscle strength of the observation group 4 hours after operation was significantly weaker than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of the muscle strength between two groups at other time points (P>0.05). The limb active flexion angle of 24h, 36h, 48h after operation in the observation were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group(42.86%) was significantly higher than that in the observation group(6.12%) (P<0.05). The score of patients satisfaction in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). ConclusionsThe effect of CFNB on postoperative analgesia of patellar fracture is exact, shows of the advantages of little influence on the muscle strength, effective postoperative pain relief, low incidence of adverse reactions, and high level of patient satisfactionl.