目的对比腹腔镜下胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术的临床疗效。方法选取210例胆囊切除术患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组105例。观察组接受腹腔镜下胆囊切除术,对照组接受传统开腹胆囊切除术。比较两组患者手术疗效及并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中术后情况均显著优于对照组(P<0.05),观察组并发症发生率为9.52%,明显低于对照组的18.10%(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胆囊切除术与传统开腹胆囊切除术相比,手术疗效更好,并发症更少,患者负重更轻,有利于早日康复。
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with traditional open cholecystectomy. Methods210 cases receiving cholecystectomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 105 cases for each. Patients in observation group were given laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients in control group were given traditional open cholecystectomy. Surgery efficacy and complications of two groups were compared. ResultsThe operative and postoperative conditions of observation group were significantly better than those of control group (P<0.05). Complication incidence of observation group was 9.52%, which was significantly lower than that of control group (18.10%), (P<0.05). ConclusionsCompared with conventional open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantage of better efficacy, less complications, lighter finical burden and faster recovery.