目的 探讨外固定支架结合有限内固定治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的疗效。方法 将80例老年桡骨远端骨折患者按照随机对照法分为对照组与观察组,每组40例。对照组给予切开复位内固定治疗,观察组患者则接受外固定支架结合有限内固定方案,采用腕关节功能评定量表评估患者近期疗效,记录两组患者术后不同阶段掌倾角与尺偏角的变化情况。结果 观察组腕关节功能恢复良好,优32例,良4例,整体优良率为90.0%,明显优于对照组的65.0%,两组疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后3个月掌倾角为(8.3±2.5)°,尺偏角为(15.4±6.7)°,均大于对照组(P<0.05),术后6个月观察组掌倾角为(8.6±2.5)°,尺偏角为(16.1±6.8)°,同样大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在老年桡骨远端骨折患者的临床治疗中,采用外固定支架结合有限内固定方案,近期疗效好,腕关节功能恢复快,值得推广与应用。
Objective To investigate the efficacy of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation for the treatment of senile distal radius fractures. Methods Eighty elderly patients with distal radius fracture were divided into control group (n=40) and observation group (n=40) according to randomized controlled principle. The control group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation, and the observation group was treated with external fixation combined with limited internal fixation. The shortterm efficacy was evaluated using the wrist joint function assessment scale. Changes of palmar tilt and ulnar inclination in both groups at different postoperative stages were recorded. Results All patients in the observation group had good recovery of the wrist joint function, and 32 patients were assessed as excellent and 4 patients as good. The overall excellent and good rate of the observation group was obviously higher than that of the control group (90.0% vs 65.0%). There was a statistical difference in the efficacy between the two groups (P<0.05). At 3 months and at 6 months after operation, the palmar tilt [(8.3±2.5) ° and (8.6±2.5) °, respectively] and ulnar deviation [(15.4±6.7) ° and (16.1±6.8) ° , respectively] were significantly increased in the observation group compared with the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions For elderly patients with distal radius fractures, external fixation combined with limited internal fixation has good shortterm efficacy and faster recovery of wrist joint function. This approach is worthy of promotion and application.