当前位置:首页 / 改良腹腔镜与阴式大子宫切除术在肥胖患者中的应用比较
临床研究 | 更新时间:2015-07-24
|
改良腹腔镜与阴式大子宫切除术在肥胖患者中的应用比较
Comparison between modified laparoscopic hysterectomy and transvaginal hysterectomy in obese patients with large uterus

微创医学 201503期 页码:313-315

作者机构:(广西壮族自治区民族医院、广西医科大学附属民族医院妇科,南宁市530001)

基金信息:作者简介:甘精华(1969~),女,本科,副主任医师,研究方向:妇科内镜及妇科肿瘤。(收稿日期:20150221修回日期:20150419)

DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2015.03.17

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献
目的 对比大子宫(子宫大小≥孕12周)肥胖患者经改良腹腔镜与经阴道子宫切除术的优点及手术结局。方法 因子宫肌瘤行全子宫切除术的肥胖患者103例,其中54例行改良腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH组),49例行阴式子宫切除术(TVH组),比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、子宫重量、术后排气时间、住院费用及围术期并发症的发生率。结果 TLH组54例中,完全腹腔镜下完成手术51例,2例中转TVH,1例转开腹;TVH组49例中,阴式大子宫切除术完成48例,1例中转开腹。TLH组手术时间[(113.0±33.8)min]、术中出血[(94.2±50.1)mL]均显著低于TVH组[(146.8±43.4)min、(138.0±48.0)mL](P<0.05)。而TLH组住院费用[(7 749±1 110)元]明显高于TVH组[(5 543±1 054)元](P<0.05)。两组子宫重量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间及围手术期并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.594)。结论 对肥胖患者来说,两种术式均为微创、安全、有效,TLH比TVH术野清晰,手术时间短,出血少,但TVH费用相对低。临床应综合考虑患者具体情况、术者的技术及器械设备等因素来选择安全、有效术式。
Objective To compare the advantages and outcomes of modified total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with total transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) in obese patients with large uterus (uterine size≥12 weeks). Methods 103 obese patients underwent total hysterectomy due to hysteromyoma, including 54 cases with modified total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH group) and 49 cases with total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH group). Operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, uterine weight, postoperative anal exhaust time, cost and incidence of perioperative complications were compared between two groups. Results In the TLH group, modified TLH was completed uneventfully in 51 cases, and conversion to TVH was performed in 2 cases, conversion to open operation in one case. In the TVH group, TVH was completed in 48 cases and conversion to open operation was conducted in one case. The operation duration in the TLH group was shorter than the TVH group [(113.0±33.8) min vs (146.8±43.4) min, P<0.05]. And the mean intraoperative blood loss was less in the TLH group compared with the TVH group [(94.2±50.1) mL vs (138.0±48.0) mL, P<0.05].The mean cost of the TVH group was lower and that of the TLH group[(5 543±1 054) yuan vs.(7 749±1 110) yuan, P<0.05)]. There was no significant difference in the postoperative anal exhaust time, uterine weight and incidence of perioperative complications between two groups (P=0.594). Conclusions Both approaches are minimally invasive, safe and effective for obese patients.TLH has the advantages of clear operative field, shorter operative duration and less blood loss, whereas the cost of TVH is less. Clinicians should take account of the patient′s condition, surgeon′s skill and surgical apparatus before choosing a surgical approach which is more safe and effective for patients.
  • ref

1995

浏览量

895

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集